We use cookies to track usage of our site. Details of these can be found on our Cookie Policy. You may choose to decline all tracking cookies, but if you do some key features may not work as expected.
Providing clients with exceptional, award-winning legal services in Leamington Spa
Every client an advocate. That's the Wright Hassall way.
We’re passionate about delivering more than just exceptional legal expertise. Our clients often say that, beyond our legal knowledge, they appreciate our proactive approach, commercial insight, and dedication to value. Most importantly, they say we have great people that they enjoy working with.
Client satisfaction is at the heart of what we do. After each matter, we reach out to understand how well we’ve met or exceeded expectations and, if there’s ever room for improvement, we make it right immediately. We do not stand still, we aim to continually improve in everything we do.
Tina Chander has been particularly helpful with her knowledge of Acas and employment tribunal claim processes which she helped us work through. Offering up further ideas and drafting communications/letters/documents completely on our behalf to a high standard as well.
Legal 500 2025
"Sarah Perry is a "sensible lawyer who is commercially savvy and robust, and always acts in the client's interest."
Chambers UK
We act for national and international companies as well as SMEs and individuals across our region and beyond.
This case study is part of a wider article "No Contract. No Problem?" which explores why legal formalities under the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 matter, what happens when they’re not followed, and how equitable remedies like constructive trusts and proprietary estoppel can sometimes offer a lifeline. Through key cases, it highlights when informal agreements may still hold weight and when “no contract” really does mean “no deal.”
This case study is part of a wider article "No Contract. No Problem?" which explores why legal formalities under the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 matter, what happens when they’re not followed, and how equitable remedies like constructive trusts and proprietary estoppel can sometimes offer a lifeline. Through key cases, it highlights when informal agreements may still hold weight and when “no contract” really does mean “no deal.”
This case study is part of a wider article "No Contract. No Problem?" which explores why legal formalities under the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 matter, what happens when they’re not followed, and how equitable remedies like constructive trusts and proprietary estoppel can sometimes offer a lifeline. Through key cases, it highlights when informal agreements may still hold weight and when “no contract” really does mean “no deal.”