Contesting a will

The grounds for contesting a will include: 

1. lack of testamentary capacity
2. undue influence or coercion
3. lack of knowledge and approval
4. Wills Act 1837
5. and forgery and fraud.

What happens when a will is contested?  

Contesting a will is a complex process; we’ll help identify the best way to address your concerns about the execution of a will including mediation and, where appropriate, taking the matter to court.

The first thing to do is to establish the will has been properly signed and witnessed in order to make it valid. If you suspect that it may not be valid, you can contest it on the grounds of its validity.

When a will is contested, the executor(s) normally takes a neutral approach so they aren’t responsible for legal costs if there are concerns about how they have handled the estate. This may mean administering the estate is delayed significantly while the parties involved attempt to come to a friendly resolution or until the matter is resolved by an Order of the Court.

What are the grounds for contesting a will?

There are generally two bases for contesting a will; either the will itself is invalid, or it fails to make ‘reasonable financial provision’ for a family member or someone who was financially maintained before their death.

There are a few grounds on which you may be able to question whether the will is valid. In legal terms, the grounds for contesting a will are:

1. lack of testamentary capacity
2. undue influence or coercion
3. lack of knowledge and approval
4. Wills Act 1837
5. and forgery and fraud.

The validity of a will can be contested if you believe it was created under one or more of following conditions:

The person who has died did not have sufficient mental capacity at the time the will was drawn up

This is called a lack of ‘testamentary capacity’. The law says that, at the time of drawing their will up, the person must be of “sound mind, memory and understanding.” This means that the person making the will must:

• Understand what they are doing and what effects those actions will have
• Understand the full extent of what they are distributing
• Be able to appreciate the effects of including or excluding certain people from their will
• Not have a ‘disorder of the mind’  

If you want to know more about contesting a will on the grounds of lack of testamentary capacity, you can read our guide here.

The person who died did not have sufficient knowledge and approval

For a will to be valid, a person must have understood and approved the contents. Knowledge and approval are normally presumed when the will is executed correctly and the person had the necessary capacity, but there are a few circumstances where the Court may require evidence to prove knowledge and approval was given if there are any disputes:

• The person making the will was deaf and/or dumb (couldn’t speak)
• The person making the will could not speak and write, or was paralysed
• The person making the will was blind or illiterate
• The will was signed by someone other than the person making the will at his or her instruction

When there is suspicion that the person making the will did not know or approve of the will, the people who believe the will to be valid are the ones who have to prove it is so.

Undue influence

Someone else interfered with the creation of the will, meaning they exerted undue influence on the distribution of assets against the individual’s desire. 

If someone coerces or forces someone into changing their will for the coercer’s benefit, this is called undue influence. It can be very hard to prove, however, as the law doesn’t presume that people in a position of power over the person who has died being named in the will is the result of undue influence.

Someone exerting undue influence can include physical violence, purposely giving inaccurate information, or verbal bullying, but it can also include asking incessantly – what matters is that their wishes overpowered those of the person who has died.

It can be particularly difficult to demonstrate that a will is invalid because of undue influence; exerting pressure (like “but we’re family”) or appealing to moral reasons (like “remember all the things I have done for you”) to be included is not normally considered undue influence unless it overpowered the will of the person who has died.

The will is a forgery or is fraudulent

If either the entire will or the signature of the person who made the will is forged, or the content of the will is fraudulent, then the will is invalid. A fraudulent will is one that includes wishes against the person who has died; it is similar to undue influence but does not require coercion. These grounds can also include beneficiaries (someone who would or does benefit from the will) or non-beneficiaries destroying versions of the will for their gain.

The will has not been executed properly, meaning the estate has not been distributed in accordance with the person’s wishes

A valid will complies with Section 9 if the Wills Act (1837), and must:

• Be in writing and signed by the person making the will.
• The person making the will must have signed it with the intention of creating a valid will.
• Two people must witness the will maker’s signature. Those witnesses must either be present when the will maker signs or, the witness must be told by the will maker, that is his/her signature.
• The witness then either signs having seen the will maker sign, or signs in the knowledge that it is the will maker’s signature on the document and that the will maker did signed it, with the intention of creating a valid document.

Reasonable financial provision

It may also be possible to seek reasonable financial provision if you depended financially upon the person who has died but no such provision has been made in the will, under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. The Act also sets out who is entitled to make a claim on these grounds; normally, spouses or civil partners, cohabitants of two or more years, children, and people who can show they were being supported financially by the person.

Costs of contesting a will

Contesting a will can, unfortunately, be a costly process. Because of the variation in work required from case to case, it’s hard to give an average cost of contesting a will.

As is usual with litigation, the court normally decides who bears the cost – although it is most likely that the losing party will pay for the winning party’s costs (in addition to their own). Because of this, it can’t be assumed that costs will be met by the estate. There are a couple of circumstances when the court may make an alternative order as to who pays what:

• If the person who made the will, or the people who are interested in what’s left of the estate, are found to have caused the legal challenge, then the costs may be taken from what is left of the estate.
• If the court thinks that an investigation into the will, then each party will cover their own costs.

Because of the potential costs, it’s crucial to assess the merits of a claim and the chances of proving successful before any action is undertaken.

Contesting a will after probate

It’s important to act as quickly as possible if you think you may have grounds for contesting a will. This is because it’s easier to notify the executor(s) of the will of a claim before anything is distributed. If a will may be invalid, a ‘caveat’ can be entered against the state to prevent a Grant of Probate being issued.

It is technically possible to contest a will after probate has been granted, but this can result in practical difficulties if assets have already been distributed.