2021-11-08
Blogs

175 Strange Laws

Home / Knowledge base / 175 Strange Laws

Posted by Rhys Jarman on 19 April 2021

Rhys Jarman - IP Disputes Lawyer
Rhys Jarman Partner - Head of IP, Technology and Manufacturing Disputes
Sign up for updates

Share article

Tags:

About the author

Rhys Jarman

Partner - Head of IP, Technology and Manufacturing Disputes

Rhys specialises in the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights and technology disputes. Rhys is interested in all things "Brexit" and is a member of our Brexit Advisory Board.

Rhys Jarman

Rhys specialises in the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights and technology disputes. Rhys is interested in all things "Brexit" and is a member of our Brexit Advisory Board.

Recent articles

02 September 2025 Armstrong v Armstrong: remedy for successful proprietary estoppel claim

At a recent remedy hearing in the High Court, Armstrong v Armstrong, held to determine the award for a proved proprietary estoppel claim, the judge reinforced the principle outlined in the Supreme Court ruling in Guest v Guest, which focused on the ‘prevention or undoing of unconscionable conduct, not expectation fulfilment or detriment compensation.’

Read article
27 August 2025 Corporate team act on acquisition of health tech business

A leading Midlands legal services business has supported a smart device company to acquire a Surrey-based health technology company – enabling it to launch a ground-breaking new upgrade.

Read article
22 August 2025 Yes…But is it art? – When IP rights can protect your creation

Explore how IP rights protect beautiful creations. Lessons from the WaterRower case and what “artistic craftsmanship” means for your business.

Read article