Legal Articles

Adjudication or winding-up bankruptcy?

Home / Knowledge base / Adjudication or winding-up bankruptcy?

Posted by Stuart Thwaites on 27 February 2019

Stuart Thwaites Legal Director

Adjudication and the insolvency process are not always easy companions, based as they are on very different legislation. This can be seen from the following scenario.

Monies have been certified but not paid. There is no pay less notice. Can I simply issue a winding up petition rather than incurring the irrecoverable costs of adjudication?

A common scenario.

Although it might seem a tempting option, using the winding-up/bankruptcy route can be a high risk option where there is a genuine defence, set-off or cross-claim. 

The general rule under the insolvency legislation is that the insolvency courts will not allow a winding-up petition where there is a genuine dispute over the sums claimed, and/or a genuine set-off or cross-claim. 

This issue came before the courts in Breyer Group Plc v RBK Engineering Ltd[1]. RBK carried out electrical works for Breyer. A dispute arose as to payment. Rather than adjudicate, RBK issued a winding up petition, no doubt in the hope that would prompt Breyer to pay.

Instead, Breyer commenced court proceedings seeking an urgent injunction to prevent RBK from advertising its winding up petition, and for it to be struck out. It said it disputed the claim, was solvent, and had a substantial cross claim.

The Judgment

The judge looked at both party’s claims against the other. He accepted that Breyer had a genuine defence to RBK’s claim, and a substantial cross claim against RBK.

The judge stated “The courts have recognised on numerous occasions that such [insolvency] proceedings are not the place for resolving genuinely disputed debt claims which the [insolvency] court cannot properly determine, either as to merits or as to quantum…”

The court accordingly struck out RBK’s winding up petition. RBK would have been liable for Breyer’s costs, as well as its own. It would have been an expensive exercise for RBK, which achieved nothing. The court’s message is clear – insolvency courts are not the place to resolve genuine disputes over claims.

[1] [2017] EWHC 1206 (Ch)

About the author

Stuart Thwaites

Legal Director

Stuart specialises in construction and engineering work in relation to resolving disputes and in the drafting and negotiation of contractual documentation.

Stuart Thwaites

Stuart specialises in construction and engineering work in relation to resolving disputes and in the drafting and negotiation of contractual documentation.

Recent articles

03 June 2020 Why use lawyers to draft your will or administer an estate?

In theory, drafting your own will using an off-the-shelf template, purchased online or from good stationers, can be a quick and easy way of leaving instructions on how you want your assets to be distributed after your death. Nonetheless, a will is a legal document and if it has been incorrectly worded and / or witnessed it may be invalid, meaning your estate would pass in accordance with the rules of intestacy (government provisions setting out how an estate should be divided if there is no will).

Read article
03 June 2020 Covid-19: a tour de force of force majeure?

In the following article, UK supply chain and logistics consultant, Paul Trudgian, and logistics law firm, Wright Hassall LLP, consider the impact of Covid-19 on the logistics industry. At the time of writing, we are now into week ten of lockdown and, by now, it is likely you will have read an article or two about the possibility of using force majeure to excuse non-performance of obligations due to Covid-19.

Read article
03 June 2020 Good markets hiding bad advice

Welcome to Wright Hassall’s podcast on “Good Markets Hiding Bad Advice”.

Read article
How can we help?
01926 732512