Legal Articles

Arcadia and its pension schemes: the results

Home / Knowledge base / Arcadia and its pension schemes: the results

Posted by Cécilia Wong on 18 June 2019

Cecilia Wong - Commercial Pensions Lawyer
Cécilia Wong Senior Associate

All seven of the proposed company voluntary arrangements (CVAs) in respect of the Arcadia Group were approved last week, on 12 June 2019. The vote had been delayed by a week in order for Sir Philip Green to negotiate with its landlords such that the proposals would be accepted.

What does this mean?

As the detail of the CVAs still emerge, Sir Philip Green’s plan involves closing an initial 23 of Arcadia’s 566 UK and Irish stores and rent reductions of 25% to 50% across 194 locations over three years (this was a negotiated position from more drastic cuts originally sought). The hook for many of the landlords was perhaps to accept this or for the Arcadia Group to fall into administration. Despite considerable protest, this potentially demonstrates the shift in power between landlords and their tenants, particularly where large and numerous properties are involved.

Whilst it has been announced that that the future of the Arcadia Group is now on a much firmer footing, entering into CVAs is no guarantee of survival. Both Toys r Us and BHS carried out CVAs but nevertheless collapsed into administration.

What does this mean for the Arcadia Group’s two defined benefit pension schemes?

The Arcadia Group’s landlords are not the Group’s only large creditors. Following pressure from the Pensions Regulator and Rt Hon Frank Field MP (Chair of the Work and Pensions Committee), the trustees’ of the Arcadia Group’s defined benefit pension schemes were offered security over Arcadia Group assets valued at £210 million and a £100 million cash injection over the next three years, as part of the CVA deal.

Whilst the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) and the Pensions Regulator have agreed to the amended CVAs, and whilst this deal will save the Arcadia Group schemes from falling into the PPF for the time being (the approval of the CVAs will result in the schemes coming out of the PPF assessment period that they were in), the Work and Pensions Committee remains concerned about the schemes’ future, asking further questions of the Pensions Regulator on the day the CVAs were approved last week.

Additional questions mainly surround the detail of the £210 million security package being offered, namely where these assets are located (in this country or outside), why the package was acceptable to the Pensions Regulator instead of cash and whether there could be other claims by creditors on these assets. The Pensions Regulator may be unable to disclose any more information to Frank Field on the basis that it might be restricted under the Pensions Act 2004, but it is yet to respond. It may be that the trustees of the Arcadia Group schemes intend to enter into some form of asset-backed contribution arrangement, although no such information has yet been divulged.

Either way, in light of the BHS pension fiasco at the time and Frank Field’s long-time and vocal criticism of Sir Philip Green, it is extremely likely that the developments surrounding the Arcadia Group’s defined benefit pension schemes will be closely watched by many.   

What does this means for the future of defined benefit pension schemes more generally?

It is no surprise that many surveys of defined benefit schemes show they are increasingly closing to future accrual, with only 4% of such schemes in the country still open to new members. John Lewis is the latest UK high street retailer to announce it intends to close the large defined benefit section of its pension scheme from April 2020 to manage its liabilities, noting that in the last 12 months, its pension costs were more than four times’ the total employee bonus for the year.  

While there are still approximately 11 million savers relying on defined benefit pensions for their retirement, many companies, trustees and the Government alike are starting to look at other options to the traditional model, such as the creation of consolidations and superfunds. Whilst the pension aspects of the Arcadia Group’s CVAs may well see the schemes and its members in a better position than entering into the PPF, it is apparent that these types of pension schemes, in their traditional format, are increasingly unsustainable for businesses, and other options need to be explored to best protect the members of these schemes.   

About the author

Cécilia Wong

Senior Associate

Cécilia is a pensions and commercial lawyer. Cécilia advises clients on a broad range of commercial contracts, and companies and trustees of pension schemes on their pension arrangements.

Cécilia Wong

Cécilia is a pensions and commercial lawyer. Cécilia advises clients on a broad range of commercial contracts, and companies and trustees of pension schemes on their pension arrangements.

Recent articles

30 July 2020 Rethinking the landlord / tenant relationship

We have been following the travails of the high street for over 12 months where changing shopping habits, business rates and rent increases have been contributing to a growing strain on many landlord / tenant relationships. The Covid-19 pandemic has not only turned a bad situation critical for many retailers and hospitality venues but has also turned the spotlight on the wider commercial sector too. Almost all businesses operating across the country have suffered financially to a greater or lesser extent as result of the economic downturn precipitated by the imposition of lockdown in March.

Read article
30 July 2020 Bankrupts fail in claim to have interests in land revested in them

The claim by Mr and Mrs Brake (Brake v Swift), heard in the High Court in May, to have a cottage and adjacent land revested in them under Section 283A of the Insolvency Act 1986, was set against a background of convoluted litigation extending over a number of years, described by Matthews HHJ as ‘complex’. The claimants had been made bankrupt in 2015 and the matter before the Court concentrated on whether or not the property concerned was, indeed, the claimants’ principal residence at the time of the bankruptcy.

Read article
29 July 2020 Remote witnessing of wills – a sign of the times

The law governing how a will is witnessed dates back to 1837 and for good reason. The requirement for two people (neither of whom can inherit from the will they are witnessing) to be physically present at the signing of a will is designed to, among other things, prevent fraud and the exercise of undue influence. That is, until the Covid-19 pandemic struck.

Read article
How can we help?
01926 732512