2020-03-20
Legal Articles

Coronavirus: residential landlords – latest government guidance

Home / Knowledge base / Coronavirus: residential landlords – latest government guidance

Posted by Mary Rouse on 20 March 2020

On Wednesday 18 March, the government announced measures in an attempt to provide some reassurance for both residential landlords and tenants.  We are not sure how reassured either landlords or tenants will be.

Mortgage commitments

For many landlords, their rental income is vital to meet mortgage commitments.  The government has recognised this and landlords who have buy-to-let mortgages, where the ability of their tenant to pay rent has been affected by any aspect of the coronavirus pandemic, will be able to take advantage of the three-month mortgage payment holiday, already available to home owners in difficulty.

It is not yet clear what evidence will be needed. It is likely that it will be left to lenders to set the criteria.  If landlords are already seeing missed rental payments, it would be prudent to ask their tenant to confirm in writing what their circumstances are, i.e. laid off, made redundant or simply receiving statutory sick pay.  Landlords should give lenders a few days grace before making contact to discuss this relief.  Lenders are already struggling to manage enquiries from those who are owner occupiers.

A mortgage holiday is simply a break from paying the mortgage and landlords will have to make up the missing payments at some point.  Lenders are likely to be happy enter into a payment plan to repay the arrears over a reasonable period and it is worth landlords knowing that the remaining term of the mortgage is considered by the court to be a reasonable period for repayment of mortgage arrears.

Rent arrears

Tenants have not been afforded any sort of break from paying rent.  What the government has said is that no tenant who cannot pay their rent due to the coronavirus will be forced out of their home.  Whilst the tenant is unable to pay, rent arrears are going to accrue.  The government has said that, at the end of the three-month period, landlords and tenants will be expected to work together to establish an affordable repayment plan, taking into account a tenant’s individual circumstances.

Possession proceedings

New legislation is being rushed through to provide further protection for tenants.  The immediate implications are:

  • No new possession claims will be issued at courts for the next three months (at least). It is not clear if this will apply to possession claims based on rent arrears only, or whether it will extend to claims brought pursuant to S21 of the Housing Act 1988, which is the ‘no fault’ repossession route where a landlord might simply want their property back, rent arrears or no rent arrears.
  • The Pre-Action Protocol currently in place for social landlords (requiring them to take certain steps before proceedings can be issued) is going to be revised to include protection for tenants who have accrued rent arrears due to the coronavirus pandemic. Again, until we see the new legislation and the revised protocol, we will not know whether the protocol requirements will extend to the use of S21 Notices, but it seems likely that it will.
  • There was no mention of proceedings that may already have been issued but it seems likely that the Court will be seeking to protect tenants as much as possible and so expect Judges to exercise more discretion than usual.
  • Given that the government was already looking at ways to shake up housing legislation and potentially remove S21 entirely, it is possible that this emergency legislation will remain in perpetuity.

More generally, there has been no mention of the impact of non-payment of mortgages on individual’s credit ratings.  Currently, missing a mortgage payment will be reflected in someone’s credit score.  However, the Building Societies Association (BSA) has reported that ‘firms will make efforts to ensure that forbearance offered under these circumstances (i.e. payment holidays) will not result in an adverse impact on the customer’s credit score.’ Clearly this forbearance will depend on mortgagees speaking to their lenders and keeping lines of communication open. However, the situation will remain unclear for some time and we will continue to monitor it.

As soon as the new legislation has been released, we will be able to advise you on any particular circumstances.  Meanwhile, if you are unsure about anything, or if you are a managing agent that has a query, please get in touch

About the author

Mary Rouse

Partner

Mary is an experienced property litigation lawyer.

Mary Rouse

Mary is an experienced property litigation lawyer.

Recent articles

30 July 2020 Rethinking the landlord / tenant relationship

We have been following the travails of the high street for over 12 months where changing shopping habits, business rates and rent increases have been contributing to a growing strain on many landlord / tenant relationships. The Covid-19 pandemic has not only turned a bad situation critical for many retailers and hospitality venues but has also turned the spotlight on the wider commercial sector too. Almost all businesses operating across the country have suffered financially to a greater or lesser extent as result of the economic downturn precipitated by the imposition of lockdown in March.

Read article
30 July 2020 Bankrupts fail in claim to have interests in land revested in them

The claim by Mr and Mrs Brake (Brake v Swift), heard in the High Court in May, to have a cottage and adjacent land revested in them under Section 283A of the Insolvency Act 1986, was set against a background of convoluted litigation extending over a number of years, described by Matthews HHJ as ‘complex’. The claimants had been made bankrupt in 2015 and the matter before the Court concentrated on whether or not the property concerned was, indeed, the claimants’ principal residence at the time of the bankruptcy.

Read article
29 July 2020 Remote witnessing of wills – a sign of the times

The law governing how a will is witnessed dates back to 1837 and for good reason. The requirement for two people (neither of whom can inherit from the will they are witnessing) to be physically present at the signing of a will is designed to, among other things, prevent fraud and the exercise of undue influence. That is, until the Covid-19 pandemic struck.

Read article
Contact
How can we help?
01926 732512
CALL BACK