2024-10-14
Legal Articles

Labours first 100 days: Planning Updates

Home / Knowledge base / Labours first 100 days: Planning Updates

Posted by Gemma Macintyre on 14 October 2024

Gemma Macintyre Solicitor
Sign up for updates

Share article

Tags: Planning

About the author

Gemma is a solicitor within the Planning team and qualified into the team in October 2024 after completing two of her four training seats in planning.

Gemma Macintyre

Gemma is a solicitor within the Planning team and qualified into the team in October 2024 after completing two of her four training seats in planning.

Recent articles

17 October 2025 Social media & the workplace: who owns what at the end of a relationship?

We all know that social media, if used well, it is a fantastic resource for businesses and individuals. However, unwise social media posts risk legal action, particularly if the boundaries of personal and professional life are blurred. Our Employment and Commercial Litigation teams look at some of these legal risks and their consequences and suggest how to avoid these.

Read article
16 October 2025 Nilsson v Cynberg

This case study is part of a wider article "No Contract. No Problem?" which explores why legal formalities under the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 matter, what happens when they’re not followed, and how equitable remedies like constructive trusts and proprietary estoppel can sometimes offer a lifeline. Through key cases, it highlights when informal agreements may still hold weight and when “no contract” really does mean “no deal.”

Read article
16 October 2025 Pathway to Relief v Your Best Properties Limited

This case study is part of a wider article "No Contract. No Problem?" which explores why legal formalities under the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 matter, what happens when they’re not followed, and how equitable remedies like constructive trusts and proprietary estoppel can sometimes offer a lifeline. Through key cases, it highlights when informal agreements may still hold weight and when “no contract” really does mean “no deal.”

Read article