Legal Articles

Liverpool FC and Waitrose salvage reputations

Home / Knowledge base / Liverpool FC and Waitrose salvage reputations

Posted by Daniel Jennings on 07 April 2020

Daniel Jennings Partner

Making ill-judged decisions under pressure are perhaps inevitable.  Nonetheless, anyone advising Liverpool Football Club on how to manage their reputation would hopefully not have recommended that they seek to furlough ordinary staff while its playing staff remained on full salaries.

Get your priorities right

Similarly, while supermarket retailers are recording bumper sales, one might have assumed that neither trying to save on salaries; nor requiring workers, who are self-isolating because either they, or members of their family, are showing symptoms of coronavirus, to make up their hours once they are back at work, would be a priority for Waitrose.

Surprisingly, both Liverpool FC and Waitrose both went ahead with these decisions, or applied existing policies to that end, and not unsurprisingly both faced a backlash.

However, having made a poor decision, with the accompanying reputational damage, both businesses woke up to the criticism they were receiving and avoided repeating the mistakes of, for example Wetherspoons, by responding positively to justified complaints. 

Liverpool reversed their decision a day or two later and did so with some grace and humility in a letter from Chief Executive Peter Moore.

Waitrose appears to have acted even more quickly, advising staff that their policy had changed and all self-isolating staff would be on authorised paid absence from day one (in line with government advice).

Goodwill takes years to build, and seconds to lose

Any business that treats its employees well will surely see the rewards and, even allowing for football tribalism, the goodwill that Liverpool Football Club has built up over the years will probably survive its mis-step as result of reversing its initial decision.

What will happen in regard to other businesses who have taken other controversial decisions however remains unknown.

Newcastle United and Tottenham Hotspur, for example, had announced they would take advantage of the Government funding scheme and furlough some non-playing staff. Whilst entitled to do so, the optics of paying footballers hundreds of thousands of pounds a week while asking the Government to pay 80% of the salary of other members of their staff is not a good look by anyone’s standards.

In a less reported decision, Glasgow Ranger’s Manager, Steven Gerrard, his staff and the first team squad have volunteered to defer their salaries for three months as have the Executive Directors of the club.  Although they have furloughed a number of employees, they will top up their wages so that all other staff are paid in full.  They will undoubtedly reap the rewards of that decision in the form of increased loyalty from both their staff and the wider public – with the possible exception of Celtic fans!

In contrast to Waitrose, other supermarkets appear to have been more generous in supporting staff. For example, Marks & Spencer has said that any colleague who is self-isolating for 7 to14 days can do so on full pay.

Think first, act second

As businesses hopefully become more attuned to crafting their external communications carefully to avoid the sort of criticism as received by Liverpool FC and Waitrose, they also need to be aware of how they are communicating to their own staff and what will then be communicated on social media.

Thoughtful internal messaging is key. Whether explaining internal policy regarding sickness absence, or self-isolation, or the requirement not to cancel booked holiday, the messaging must be clear but sympathetic. Anything else is likely to generate ill-will among their staff who will, in turn, report their unhappiness to the wider world. Nowadays it is not only what a business chooses to say to the outside world that matters; all communications matter as they can, and will, become public.

For advice and assistance in managing your reputation please do contact us.

About the author

Daniel advises clients on all aspects of commercial litigation and dispute resolution.

Daniel Jennings

Daniel advises clients on all aspects of commercial litigation and dispute resolution.

Recent articles

03 June 2020 Why use lawyers to draft your will or administer an estate?

In theory, drafting your own will using an off-the-shelf template, purchased online or from good stationers, can be a quick and easy way of leaving instructions on how you want your assets to be distributed after your death. Nonetheless, a will is a legal document and if it has been incorrectly worded and / or witnessed it may be invalid, meaning your estate would pass in accordance with the rules of intestacy (government provisions setting out how an estate should be divided if there is no will).

Read article
03 June 2020 Covid-19: a tour de force of force majeure?

In the following article, UK supply chain and logistics consultant, Paul Trudgian, and logistics law firm, Wright Hassall LLP, consider the impact of Covid-19 on the logistics industry. At the time of writing, we are now into week ten of lockdown and, by now, it is likely you will have read an article or two about the possibility of using force majeure to excuse non-performance of obligations due to Covid-19.

Read article
03 June 2020 Good markets hiding bad advice

Welcome to Wright Hassall’s podcast on “Good Markets Hiding Bad Advice”.

Read article
How can we help?
01926 732512