Legal Articles

Major changes to family law system to help victims of domestic abuse

Home / Knowledge base / Major changes to family law system to help victims of domestic abuse

Posted by Justin Creed on 29 July 2020

Justin Creed - Family and Divorce Lawyer
Justin Creed Head of Family Law

Against a backdrop of a wider court reform programme, the government has just announced (in June 2020) a radical change to the family justice system following the conclusion of a year-long review by an expert panel commissioned by the Ministry of Justice. A central part of the reforms, encapsulated within the Domestic Abuse Bill, is to introduce special measures to make attending court a safer experience for the victims of domestic abuse and their children in private law children proceedings.

What the panel found

The panel of experts heard evidence from over 1200 respondents, both individuals and organisations, about the difficulties experienced by those trying to navigate the family law system. Much of that evidence focused on the plight of those in former, as well as current, abusive relationships. The report referred to ‘deep-seated and systemic issues’, identifying four main problems in the way in which family courts dealt with cases involving domestic abuse. Some of the evidence heard by the panel makes for uncomfortable reading and exposed:

  • the difficulty those experiencing abuse have in making their voices heard;
  • the pro-contact culture with the emphasis on children retaining contact with both parents overriding fundamental safety issues;
  • the adversarial nature of the justice system giving the abusive party an unfair advantage, particularly where cross-examination is involved;
  • a lack of coordination between the various agencies working with affected families; and
  • lack of resources affecting all aspects of private law proceedings


Children’s voices go unheard

One surprising aspect highlighted by the report was the extent that abuse within families has been routinely underestimated by those involved in child arrangement cases. Many respondents felt that the courts, when making contact orders, did not differentiate sufficiently between ‘ordinary’ cases and those featuring domestic abuse. The way in which children are dealt with was also covered some detail – the report revealed how little influence children have within the court system to have their views heard as well as lack of coordination with those agencies with a more detailed understanding of the child’s situation. Unsurprisingly, the report also noted the difficulty experienced by those representing themselves in court without recourse to legal advice.

Proposed changes to the family court system

The changes being introduced are designed to tackle the physical and psychological safety of those attending court. Contained within the Domestic Abuse Bill, which has reached the House of Lords, the proposed reforms include:

  • the introduction of separate waiting areas and entrances to court, as well as screens in court, to ensure that abuse victims do not have to come into contact with their abusers;
  • greater powers for judges to issue barring orders to stop abusers continuing their abuse of ex-partners by repeatedly bringing them back to court;
  • the removal of the assumption that a child’s contact with both parents is the preferred position;
  • removal of the ability for one parent to cross-examine the other;
  • introducing a pilot of ‘Integrated Domestic Abuse Courts’ to ensure a joined-up approach to providing more effective and consistent support for victims. This will include the judge reviewing the evidence rather than the parents presenting their cases; and
  • better training for those involved in the family justice system.

The report has shone a light on the extent of the problems faced by domestic abuse victims and their children once they enter the legal arena. There is no doubt that the courts have been under increasing pressure for many years and lack of resources has certainly played a major part in the way such cases have been handled. As family law practitioners we have reported in the past of the negative effects of the adversarial process when trying to reach a resolution between two parties where there is no common ground, particularly where children are involved. Once abuse is factored into the equation, a difficult experience becomes deeply and overwhelmingly traumatic. This Bill will hopefully pave the way for much needed radical change to help those negotiating the family justice system.

About the author

Justin Creed

Head of Family Law

Justin specialises in advising clients going through the personal difficulties of separation in terms of the financial issues and arrangements for children.

Justin Creed

Justin specialises in advising clients going through the personal difficulties of separation in terms of the financial issues and arrangements for children.

Recent articles

11 August 2020 Medical negligence; pressure sores

Pressure sores are painful debilitating injuries which should not occur if you or your loved one is being cared for and nursed in the most supportive way.

Read article
07 August 2020 Protecting your chances of getting paid; retention of title clauses

A retention of title clause is a term within a contract for the sale of goods which states that the seller retains ownership of the goods until specified obligations are fulfilled by the buyer.

Read article
05 August 2020 Privilege: Protecting your business communications

Privilege can entitle a party involved in court proceedings to withhold a document from their opponent or to deny access to regulators and enforcement agencies.

Read article
How can we help?
01926 732512