2024-07-09
Video

Mock Employment Tribunal 2024 Part 2: Verdict and Discussion

Home / Knowledge base / Mock Employment Tribunal 2024 Part 2: Verdict and Discussion

Posted by Tina Chander on 09 July 2024

Tina Chander - Head of Employment Law
Tina Chander Partner & Head of Employment
Sign up for updates

Share article

About the author

Tina Chander

Partner & Head of Employment

Tina is head of our employment law team. She deals with contentious and non-contentious employment law issues. Tina also heads the firm's business group.

Tina Chander

Tina is head of our employment law team. She deals with contentious and non-contentious employment law issues. Tina also heads the firm's business group.

Recent articles

16 October 2025 Nilsson v Cynberg

This case study is part of a wider article "No Contract. No Problem?" which explores why legal formalities under the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 matter, what happens when they’re not followed, and how equitable remedies like constructive trusts and proprietary estoppel can sometimes offer a lifeline. Through key cases, it highlights when informal agreements may still hold weight and when “no contract” really does mean “no deal.”

Read article
16 October 2025 Pathway to Relief v Your Best Properties Limited

This case study is part of a wider article "No Contract. No Problem?" which explores why legal formalities under the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 matter, what happens when they’re not followed, and how equitable remedies like constructive trusts and proprietary estoppel can sometimes offer a lifeline. Through key cases, it highlights when informal agreements may still hold weight and when “no contract” really does mean “no deal.”

Read article
16 October 2025 Thandi v Saggu

This case study is part of a wider article "No Contract. No Problem?" which explores why legal formalities under the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 matter, what happens when they’re not followed, and how equitable remedies like constructive trusts and proprietary estoppel can sometimes offer a lifeline. Through key cases, it highlights when informal agreements may still hold weight and when “no contract” really does mean “no deal.”

Read article