Legal Articles

Proxies: are your articles of association correct?

Home / Knowledge base / Proxies: are your articles of association correct?

Posted by Robert Lee on 06 February 2011

Robert Lee Partner - Head of Corporate

An important reform under the Companies Act 2006 (the ‘2006 Act’), which has managed to avoid the glare of publicity, is the right of members of a company limited by guarantee (usually not-for-profit organisations)  to appoint a proxy, to attend, vote and also to speak at the company’s general meeting. 

Under the previous regime (the Companies Act 1985), companies limited by guarantee were not obliged to allow members to appoint a proxy, although they could make provision in their articles of association for members to do so. 

Under the 2006 Act, any provisions in a not-for-profit company’s articles of association which specifically exclude the right of members to appoint proxies will be automatically null and void. Therefore, if you have not recently reviewed your articles of association, we strongly advise you to do so. Any provisions excluding the appointment of proxies should be deleted and, ideally, where your articles are silent on the subject of proxies, you might consider outlining the procedure that needs to be followed for appointing proxies.

You also need to be aware that, under the 2006 Act, notices calling for a general meeting must include a prominent statement alerting members to their right to appoint proxies. If you do not comply, an offence is committed by every officer of the company which is in default.

Finally, other changes relating to proxies enshrined in the 2006 Act include: •changes to the timing requirements for lodging proxy notices. Any provision in the articles stating that notice for appointing a proxy has to be received more than 48 hours (calculated on the basis of working days only) before the time of the meeting, is void; and •changes to the rules relating to proxies being entitled to vote on a show of hands. This is now allowable under the 2006 Act unless otherwise stated in the company articles.

Tags: Corporate

About the author

Robert Lee

Partner - Head of Corporate

Robert specialises in mergers and acquisitions, and corporate restructuring.

Robert Lee

Robert specialises in mergers and acquisitions, and corporate restructuring.

Recent articles

29 May 2020 Return to the workplace risk assessments

Following recent Government announcements, the time has come to consider a phased return to places of work. Obviously, given the unprecedented nature of Covid-19, such a process will be riddled with confusion for both employers and employees – how will the return to work operate?

Read article
28 May 2020 Guide to restrictive covenants

Employment and consultancy contracts often contain clauses restricting an individual’s working activity when they leave a business. These clauses, ‘post termination restrictive covenants’, typically restrict the ex-staff member’s ability to work in competing businesses, to deal with clients, to try to win business from them, or to poach other staff members.

Read article
28 May 2020 Could COVID 19 bring the end of high rise and cramped living?

On 14 June it will be three years since the Grenfell tower tragedy, global warming is adversely affecting the environment causing floods and other natural disasters, and the country is on lockdown because of coronavirus.

Read article
How can we help?
01926 732512