2020-02-17
Legal Articles

ROOT2 Tax Limited – Alchemy Scheme Judgment

Home / Knowledge base / ROOT2 Tax Limited – Alchemy Scheme Judgment

Posted by Matthew Goodwin on 10 December 2019

Matthew Goodwin - Tax Disputes Lawyer
Matthew Goodwin Associate-Solicitor-Advocate

A significant judgment in the tax planning/tax avoidance sector has been announced. The long-awaited First Tier Tax Tribunal judgment has, after 18 months in the drafting been handed down. Her Honour Judge Morgan has provided a judgment that runs to over 90 pages.

The tribunal has found in favour of HMRC. This means that tax payers who used Root2 Tax Limited’s Alchemy scheme are, subject potentially to an appeal, going to be liable for income tax (PAYE) and primary and secondary Class 1 NICs.  It is unclear how HMRC are going to treat the existing Follower Notices, but we would expect HMRC to use these to leverage charges (likely to be significant) against tax payers who participated in the appeals.

We understand that no decision has yet been made in relation to whether an appeal will be made, or indeed what aspects of the Judgment will be appealed. 

A more detailed breakdown of the judgment will be provided in due course, but for now, if you would like support in considering what options you may have to pursue a claim in professional negligence and/or breach of contract against Root2 or your other previous advisers for the losses you are suffering as a consequence of the Root2 scheme, do get in touch.

We have also helped a number of clients who used the Alchemy scheme to settle their tax affairs with HMRC. If on the back of this judgment you would like assistance with negotiating a settlement with HMRC, we are well placed to support with that as well.

About the author

Matthew Goodwin

Associate-Solicitor-Advocate

As an associate within the tax and financial services litigation team, Matthew regularly acts for corporates and individuals, dealing with a variety of disputes.

Matthew Goodwin

As an associate within the tax and financial services litigation team, Matthew regularly acts for corporates and individuals, dealing with a variety of disputes.

Recent articles

30 July 2020 Rethinking the landlord / tenant relationship

We have been following the travails of the high street for over 12 months where changing shopping habits, business rates and rent increases have been contributing to a growing strain on many landlord / tenant relationships.

Read article
30 July 2020 Bankrupts fail in claim to have interests in land revested in them

The claim by Mr and Mrs Brake (Brake v Swift), heard in the High Court in May, to have a cottage and adjacent land revested in them under Section 283A of the Insolvency Act 1986, was set against a background of convoluted litigation extending over a number of years, described by Matthews HHJ as ‘complex’.

Read article
29 July 2020 Remote witnessing of wills – a sign of the times

The law governing how a will is witnessed dates back to 1837 and for good reason. The requirement for two people (neither of whom can inherit from the will they are witnessing) to be physically present at the signing of a will is designed to, among other things, prevent fraud and the exercise of undue influence. That is, until the Covid-19 pandemic struck.

Read article
Contact
How can we help?
01926 732512
CALL BACK