Legal Articles

Validity of notice to terminate a licence

Home / Knowledge base / Validity of notice to terminate a licence

Posted by Mary Rouse on 18 June 2012

Mary Rouse - Property Litigation Lawyer
Mary Rouse Partner

The recent Court of Appeal decision in Fitzhugh v Fitzhugh [2012] EWCA Civ 694 overturned the High Court’s decision and held that a notice purporting to terminate a licence was invalid if it was served by only one of the joint licence owers.

This was an unusual case in that one of the licence owers was also a licensee and as such was not willing to be involved in terminating the licence.  On reviewing the termination clause the court considered that a reasonable person, with all the background knowledge that would have been reasonably available, would not have considered the meaning of ‘licence ower’ to be any different in the termination clause within a licence to its definition in the rest of the licence.

Although it was possible to have foreseen practical difficulties and unwanted expense if a licence ower who was also the licensee refused to join service of a notice, this did not mean that it was not possible to terminate the licence under the terms of the termination clause.  The court felt that there was no justification for it to construe ‘licence ower’ as referring to all licence owers other than those who were also licensee.

This decision has implications for those drafting licences where an individual or party is both a licence ower and licensee.  If the intention is that it will be possible for a single licence ower or licensee to validly serve a notice then it is important that this be made expressly clear when the licence is agreed.

About the author

Mary Rouse


Mary is an experienced property litigation lawyer.

Mary Rouse

Mary is an experienced property litigation lawyer.

Recent articles

30 July 2020 Rethinking the landlord / tenant relationship

We have been following the travails of the high street for over 12 months where changing shopping habits, business rates and rent increases have been contributing to a growing strain on many landlord / tenant relationships. The Covid-19 pandemic has not only turned a bad situation critical for many retailers and hospitality venues but has also turned the spotlight on the wider commercial sector too. Almost all businesses operating across the country have suffered financially to a greater or lesser extent as result of the economic downturn precipitated by the imposition of lockdown in March.

Read article
30 July 2020 Bankrupts fail in claim to have interests in land revested in them

The claim by Mr and Mrs Brake (Brake v Swift), heard in the High Court in May, to have a cottage and adjacent land revested in them under Section 283A of the Insolvency Act 1986, was set against a background of convoluted litigation extending over a number of years, described by Matthews HHJ as ‘complex’. The claimants had been made bankrupt in 2015 and the matter before the Court concentrated on whether or not the property concerned was, indeed, the claimants’ principal residence at the time of the bankruptcy.

Read article
29 July 2020 Remote witnessing of wills – a sign of the times

The law governing how a will is witnessed dates back to 1837 and for good reason. The requirement for two people (neither of whom can inherit from the will they are witnessing) to be physically present at the signing of a will is designed to, among other things, prevent fraud and the exercise of undue influence. That is, until the Covid-19 pandemic struck.

Read article
How can we help?
01926 732512