2020-02-17
Legal Articles

Variations to section 106 planning obligations

Home / Knowledge base / Variations to section 106 planning obligations

Posted by John Gregory on 20 February 2013

John Gregory - Planning Lawyer
John Gregory Head of Planning and Licensing

On 28 February 2013, amendments to the Town and Country Planning (Modification and Discharge of Planning Obligations) Regulations 1992 (‘Regulations’) come into effect.

Previously, section 106A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 provided that planning obligations could not be varied or discharged until the expiry of five years from the date they were entered into. A formal application had to be made to the local planning authority (‘LPA’) in which the developer would have to show the obligation no longer served a ‘useful purpose’. In the absence of such evidence, the LPA was unlikely to discharge or adequately modify the planning obligations to overcome financial viability hurdles to development.

Whilst it has always been the case a variation could be negotiated and agreed by deed, the application process was reserved for section 106 Agreements which were at least five years old. The new Regulations now enable applications to vary or discharge planning obligations entered into prior to 6th April 2010 to be challenged and removes the five year moratorium. Note the new Regulations only apply in relation to agreements enforced by English authorities.

One of the problems of the old system was that, even if a developer and LPA agreed the terms of a variation, the practicalities of everyone signing a deed of variation were such that variations were not achieved. The application process avoids the requirement for everyone to sign a deed of variation. However, it does not enable additional burdens to be imposed on another party.

It will be interesting to see whether this slight relaxation to the current provisions actually addresses concerns regarding the high levels of stalled developments caused by section 106 viability issues. The current legal test requiring a developer to show an obligation no longer serves a ‘useful purpose’ remains. Given the broad interpretation of this test through the courts, demonstrating successfully an obligation does not serve a useful purpose remains difficult. This may limit the practical and commercial benefits of the new Regulations.

About the author

John Gregory

Head of Planning and Licensing

John is a specialist planning lawyer with extensive experience of advising on all aspects of the planning and highways law.

John Gregory

John is a specialist planning lawyer with extensive experience of advising on all aspects of the planning and highways law.

Recent articles

29 October 2020 Wright Hassall lands royal recognition

A Midlands law firm has landed royal recognition for its support to the wider community throughout the Coronavirus pandemic.

Read article
29 October 2020 A new way of approaching biodiversity offsetting

A Warwick-based property development company is supporting a project aimed at boosting wild-life levels in Warwickshire.

Read article
28 October 2020 The new model shared ownership lease

Government plans to introduce a new form of shared ownership lease from April 2021 will apply to all schemes funded by the 2021-26 Affordable Homes Programme. The intention is that it will be more consumer friendly, easier to access and allow shared owners to increase the stake in their home in a more manageable and affordable way.

Read article
Contact
How can we help?
01926 732512
CALL BACK