Legal Articles

Company cash gambled away? There may be redress.

Home / Knowledge base / Company cash gambled away? There may be redress.

Posted by Matthew Goodwin on 26 October 2018

Matthew Goodwin Associate-Solicitor-Advocate

Paddy Power Betfair has been fined £2.2 million by the Gambling Commission for permitting stolen money to be gambled.  The gambling group was criticised for failing to intervene when their customers showed signs of addiction problems, gambling “significant sums” of stolen money, and failing to carry out appropriate anti-money laundering checks.

Simon Price, the former CEO of Birmingham Dogs Home, was jailed for 5 years after being convicted of defrauding the charity of approximately £900,000 which he squandered through online gambling.

Who regulates betting groups?

The Gambling Commission are responsible for regulating the industry.  All commercial gambling businesses which hold a licence under the Gambling Act 2005 must comply with the Act and the Gambling Commission’s Licence Conditions and Code of Practice.  The Gambling Commission is also tasked with combating illegal gambling activities.

What are the responsibilities of gambling groups?

Gambling businesses have a responsibility to intervene when their customers display signs of problem gambling and must ensure that their anti-money laundering checks and welfare and social responsibility checks are effective and compliant with the regulations.

The decision in the Paddy Power case

The decision in the Betfair case offers some reassurance to companies and charities who are the victims of fraud, where directors or other senior office holders unlawfully, and in breach of their duties, use company funds to pursue their gambling additions.  Holding betting groups accountable, where appropriate checks could have prevented the stolen funds being used in this way, allows companies and charities in this position to seek to recover the substantial sums lost.

The defrauding of companies can often begin as subtle and relatively small misappropriations of money over a period of time, in some cases increasing as the perpetrator’s problem grows or becomes more desperate, culminating in significant amounts of money being stolen.  Where the perpetrator is a senior officer, or even the financial director, issues can go undetected for some time.  Often, by the time a company becomes aware that it has been defrauded, the money has already been spent or otherwise embezzled, making a financial recovery against the individual wrongdoer difficult to achieve.  The ability to seek redress from gambling businesses where the funds have been spent gambling, provides helpful redress.

How we can help

Having recently made a successful recovery from a gambling business on behalf of our client in similar circumstances, we would encourage companies to speak to us as soon as possible, should they have any concerns that company or charitable funds are being embezzled as a result of gambling.

About the author

Matthew Goodwin


As an associate within the tax and financial services litigation team, Matthew regularly acts for corporates and individuals, dealing with a variety of disputes.

Matthew Goodwin

As an associate within the tax and financial services litigation team, Matthew regularly acts for corporates and individuals, dealing with a variety of disputes.

Recent articles

01 June 2020 Medical Negligence and breast cancer – is your treatment up to date?

Headlines in today’s Daily Mail stated that “2.4M Caught in Covid Cancer Backlog”. It claimed that ‘screening checks, hospital appointments and vital treatment lost during the pandemic’ and was based on figures from Cancer Research UK. The article also quoted figures from the Office for National Statistics that 13,000 more people had died than expected from causes other than Covid.

Read article
29 May 2020 Return to the workplace risk assessments

Following recent Government announcements, the time has come to consider a phased return to places of work. Obviously, given the unprecedented nature of Covid-19, such a process will be riddled with confusion for both employers and employees – how will the return to work operate?

Read article
28 May 2020 Guide to restrictive covenants

Employment and consultancy contracts often contain clauses restricting an individual’s working activity when they leave a business. These clauses, ‘post termination restrictive covenants’, typically restrict the ex-staff member’s ability to work in competing businesses, to deal with clients, to try to win business from them, or to poach other staff members.

Read article
How can we help?
01926 732512