2020-03-07
Case Studies

Corporate manslaughter

Home / Knowledge base / Corporate manslaughter

Posted by Tariva Thomas on 05 August 2017

Tariva Thomas - Commercial Litigation Lawyer
Tariva Thomas Senior Associate

This was a sad case where an employee who was asked to work in a part of a factory where he did not usually work was killed by a piece of equipment that he was not familiar with. He was doing a job that he had not been trained to do.

In essence, he was asked to work in the wrong place at the wrong time without having had any training or experience of working there.

Central to it was the trauma and effect that the death had on the company and its workforce – which called into question the safety procedures of the company.

There were 4 different aspects to consider:-

  • the police / HSE investigation
  • the inquest (that lasted for 3 days with a jury)
  • the subsequent Health & Safety prosecution
  • a claim for damages under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976

The threat of a criminal prosecution hung over the company and its directors for approximately 3 years. Any prosecution for corporate manslaughter would have resulted in a substantial fine for the company and a possible term of imprisonment for one or more of its directors.

During this period, senior management in the company had to contend with:-

  • the initial trauma and after-math of the employee’s death
  • the investigation and its effect on the workplace
  • a “dawn raid” when police officers came to search the company’s premises for documents and evidence
  • the unfamiliar aspects of criminal proceedings and proceedings in the Coroner’s Court
  • a personal injury claim and a Health & Safety prosecution (involving proceedings in the Magistrates’ Court and ultimately, in the Crown Court)
  • the impact (mental and emotional) of all this on the directors for a lengthy period of time before the case came to trial

No two investigations are ever the same – but the experience that we have within the team to handle this type of case will ensure that our clients have the best possible advice at every stage of the investigation and proceedings as they develop. If we need to instruct and work with experts (e.g. on engineering aspects) or Barristers to represent you in Court, we will advise you on the people that can provide the best results.

About the author

Tariva Thomas

Senior Associate

Tariva is a member of the tax and financial services litigation team.

Tariva Thomas

Tariva is a member of the tax and financial services litigation team.

Recent articles

05 August 2020 Privilege: Protecting your business communications

Privilege can entitle a party involved in court proceedings to withhold a document from their opponent or to deny access to regulators and enforcement agencies.

Read article
30 July 2020 Rethinking the landlord / tenant relationship

We have been following the travails of the high street for over 12 months where changing shopping habits, business rates and rent increases have been contributing to a growing strain on many landlord / tenant relationships.

Read article
30 July 2020 Bankrupts fail in claim to have interests in land revested in them

The claim by Mr and Mrs Brake (Brake v Swift), heard in the High Court in May, to have a cottage and adjacent land revested in them under Section 283A of the Insolvency Act 1986, was set against a background of convoluted litigation extending over a number of years, described by Matthews HHJ as ‘complex’.

Read article
Contact
How can we help?
01926 732512
CALL BACK