Legal Articles

Judicial review of the Care Quality Commission decisions

Home / Knowledge base / Judicial review of the Care Quality Commission decisions

Posted by Ana Lelliott on 24 April 2018

Blank Person
Ana Lelliott Solicitor

Can I judicially review a decision of the Care Quality Commission (‘CQC’)?

The CQC is a public body and is therefore subject to judicial review if;

  • The decision or act is public in nature;
  • You have a ‘sufficient interest’ in the decision, act or omission;
  • You can satisfy one of the grounds for challenging the decision, act or omission;
  • You have exhausted internal procedures and/or alternative remedies; and
  • You are within the applicable time limits

Do I have a ‘sufficient interest’ to bring a claim?

In order to bring a claim for judicial review you need to show that you have a ‘sufficient interest’ in the subject matter of the decision you are seeking to challenge. As a service provider and proprietor of a Care Home which is the subject of a decision made by the CQC, such as a rating following an inspection, you would have sufficient interest to bring a claim.

What are the grounds for judicial review?

The grounds for reviewing a decision or act of a public body are:

  • Illegality – the CQC has acted outside the law governing the action in question
  • Procedural unfairness – the CQC has not followed the proper procedures
  • Irrationality – the decision was unreasonable (so unreasonable that no reasonable person could have reached it)
  • Material considerations – the CQC did not take into account relevant information or took into account irrelevant information when making its decision
  • Legitimate expectations – the CQC has departed from previous assurances it has given that it would act in a certain way
  • Mistake of fact – a CQC inspector may have incorrectly recorded facts during an inspection
  • Proportionality – in claims involving human rights or European Law it may be necessary to decide whether an act or decision was proportionate to a legitimate aim.
  • Reasons - there is no general obligation on a public body to give reasons for a decision, however, in certain cases an obligation to give reasons may be imposed by legislation, governmental guidance, or common law.

The court will not interfere with the act or decision of a public body merely because it disagrees with or has doubts about the quality or merits of a particular decision.  It is necessary for a claimant to demonstrate a legal flaw.

Am I within time?

There are strict time limits which apply to judicial review:

  • A claim for judicial review should be filed promptly and in any event within 3 months from the date the grounds to make a claim first arose. This is usually the date of the decision you wish to challenge.
  • A claim for certain procurement judicial review must be filed within 30 days.

About the author

Ana Lelliott


Ana is a commercial litigation solicitor: she advises companies, individuals and partnerships about all manner of disputes.

Ana Lelliott

Ana is a commercial litigation solicitor: she advises companies, individuals and partnerships about all manner of disputes.

Recent articles

03 April 2020 Coronavirus: Companies offered potential lifeline

All businesses are now operating in uncharted waters. The government is reviewing its support for businesses on an almost daily basis and, last weekend, the Business Secretary announced a proposed relaxation of the law around ‘wrongful trading’ for 3 months (see our guide for more detail) thereby giving directors of otherwise viable businesses space to see whether the package of government incentives will enable them to survive the pandemic. Alok Sharma also announced he was considering other measures, largely based on the government response to the proposed changes to the insolvency regime in 2018.

Read article
03 April 2020 Coronavirus: wrongful trading laws to be suspended

There will undoubtedly be many directors who, increasingly concerned about the solvency of their businesses and their potential exposure to personal liability for trading whilst insolvent, may have been considering whether to shut down during this pandemic. The UK Business Secretary, Alok Sharma, recently announced proposed new insolvency measures to suspend the laws on wrongful trading to offer some protection to business directors.

Read article
03 April 2020 Coronavirus: Impact on maintaining contact with care homes residents

A recent Court of Protection decision, BP v Surrey County Council & Anor [2020] EWCOP 17, highlights the difficulties now arising due the Coronavirus pandemic in maintaining contact with our family and friends, especially keeping in touch with those living in care homes. As many care homes have imposed restrictions on visitors, including close family members physically seeing their loved ones, Mr Justice Hayden ultimately had to weigh up whether it was in the resident’s best interests to remain at the care home or return home with a designated care package.

Read article
How can we help?
01926 732512