2020-03-10
Legal Articles

Leases and electronic signatures

Home / Knowledge base / Leases and electronic signatures

Posted by Andrew Jones on 13 November 2018

Andrew Jones - Real Estate Lawyer
Andrew Jones Partner

Despite electronic signatures being generally accepted as legally valid, property professionals are still uncertain whether or not they can sign or accept the signature of leases (or similar documents) electronically.

Understandably there is a growing demand for leases (among other documents) to be digitally authorised to speed up property transactions, so it is unsurprising that there is frustration that the Law Commission and the Land Registry are running two separate consultations on the issue, rather than a joint one to speed up matters.

Land Registry and Law Commission holding consultations on electronic signatures

The Law Commission sets out its position in relation to the use of electronic signatures in place of wet ink signatures. The Electronic Communications Act 2000 (s.7) provides that electronic signatures are admissible as evidence in legal proceedings (although doesn’t expressly provide for their validity). Further there is a growing body of case law where electronic signatures (including even a typed name in an email) have been accepted by the Courts as enough to satisfy statutory requirements for a signature. The Land Registry accepted its first digital mortgage in April of this year but this process has yet to be extended to anything other than mortgages.

It is important to note that the Law of Property Act 1925, which is the basis for most modern land law, requires certain documents to be made by deed for them to be legally effective. This includes leases for more than 3 years, and grants of easements (e.g. rights of way). Where documents should be made by deed, but are not, then the rights granted take effect only in equity. This can mean that rights might not bind successors in title, and could cause significant difficulties both in relation to various notices (e.g. break notices or notices required under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954), and the grant of further rights adversely affecting the tenant.

Electronic execution of deeds is proving a sticking point

In light of the consultations above, it is tempting to think that a lease for less than 3 years could be signed electronically; however, this is unlikely to be possible. Although both the , the Land Registry and Law Commission consultations appear to be broadly in favour of electronic signatures, neither are so clear on the position of executing a deed using electronic signatures.

Many short term leases are used in relation to multi-occupancy buildings where tenants are granted rights to use the common parts (e.g. service yards, toilets, or corridors). These rights are easements and in order to be legally effective must be registered at the Land Registry. As noted above, easements must be made by deed.

The Law Commission consultation considers a range of possibilities from the signing of a document being witnessed by someone physically present who then adds their electronic signature to the witness.  This approach relies on digital confirmation from the signatory that the signatory has signed. The requirement for a witness to be physically present is not a high barrier as there are few restrictions on who can witness a signature and we consider this requirement should be retained. The Land Registry, on the other hand, is reviewing a number of technology-assisted options.

Wet ink signatures likely to stay in the medium term

Sadly, neither the Land Registry nor the Law Commission have yet come to a conclusion on the electronic execution of deeds and so property professionals are left executing documents in the same way we have for centuries – with wet ink signatures.

It is important that lawyers work efficiently to deliver documents that implement their clients’ instructions so that commercial transactions are not delayed; tenants can get on with their businesses; and landlords can start collecting rent from their assets.

About the author

Andrew has considerable experience in acting for clients on the acquisition and disposal of freehold and leasehold commercial properties.

Andrew Jones

Andrew has considerable experience in acting for clients on the acquisition and disposal of freehold and leasehold commercial properties.

Recent articles

30 July 2020 Rethinking the landlord / tenant relationship

We have been following the travails of the high street for over 12 months where changing shopping habits, business rates and rent increases have been contributing to a growing strain on many landlord / tenant relationships.

Read article
30 July 2020 Bankrupts fail in claim to have interests in land revested in them

The claim by Mr and Mrs Brake (Brake v Swift), heard in the High Court in May, to have a cottage and adjacent land revested in them under Section 283A of the Insolvency Act 1986, was set against a background of convoluted litigation extending over a number of years, described by Matthews HHJ as ‘complex’.

Read article
29 July 2020 Remote witnessing of wills – a sign of the times

The law governing how a will is witnessed dates back to 1837 and for good reason. The requirement for two people (neither of whom can inherit from the will they are witnessing) to be physically present at the signing of a will is designed to, among other things, prevent fraud and the exercise of undue influence. That is, until the Covid-19 pandemic struck.

Read article
Contact
How can we help?
01926 732512
CALL BACK